Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:21

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Are you worried that the 2024 US presidential election will result in a close race?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sony’s DualSense Edge controller is receiving a rare $30 discount - The Verge
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Rotation Notes: Scherzer, Stroman, Imanaga, Eovaldi - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Prime Day is back July 8-11, with double the days and millions of deals - About Amazon
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What are some K-pop idols with smiles that are healing?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Quia quia unde harum qui quas.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why do most people care so much about what others think? Are they afraid of society norms?